Technical AuditAnonymized technical audit

A retailer running three brands on one commerce platform needed to know what was genuinely at risk before committing the next year of engineering budget. Marsos assessed the estate end to end and delivered a ranked remediation plan — what threatens the business now, what can safely wait, and what it costs to leave alone.

Salesforce Commerce CloudSFRAArchitecture ReviewSecurity AssessmentPerformance AuditStorefront QAWCAG Review

Delivery signals

Audit coverage, end to end

3 brands

sharing one commerce platform, assessed together

13

critical and high-severity risks documented

3 phases

remediation sequenced by business risk, not technical preference

32

platform components reviewed across the estate

01 / Context

The operating environment

An anonymized retailer needed an independent review of a multi-brand Salesforce Commerce Cloud platform before committing to remediation and longer-term delivery. The source assessment covered code, staging behaviour, architecture, security, performance, storefront quality, and accessibility.

02 / Business outcome

What changed for the client

The result this engagement delivered — before any of the engineering behind it.

01

Converted a broad technical assessment into a prioritized three-phase remediation roadmap.

02

Made shared-platform, brand-isolation, payment, loyalty, security, performance, accessibility, and conversion risks visible in one decision-ready ledger.

03

Separated urgent business-protection work from longer-term architecture, governance, and growth improvements.

03 / Challenge

Business need vs. technical reality

Each requirement collided with a hard platform constraint — this is the gap the engineering had to close.

Business need

Extend a three-brand platform to new brands and markets with confidence.

Technical constraint

Multi-brand code duplication was already increasing the cost of every change — each fix a multi-brand liability.

Business need

An engineering-level view of platform readiness before further investment.

Technical constraint

No independent security review had been performed since the platform's original build-out.

Business need

Quantify exposure across security, performance and conversion.

Technical constraint

Front-end monitoring showed stable Core Web Vitals — masking deep server-side risk invisible to business dashboards.

04 / Delivery

What Marsos engineered

01

Performed codebase and architecture review across the shared platform and brand layers.

02

Assessed payment and loyalty integration boundaries, data integrity, security, privacy, and operational failure handling.

03

Validated storefront behaviour, performance, asset delivery, accessibility, and primary conversion paths.

04

Produced a severity-ranked risk summary and a three-phase remediation roadmap.

05 / How it works

The remediation roadmap

The system, one step at a time — the sequence that carries an order, a shipment or a decision from start to done.

  1. 01

    Phase 1 — Immediate business protection

    Before the next production deployment: strip credentials and signing keys from logs and rotate them, remove the hardcoded payment encryption key, fix the add-to-cart failure and suppress zero-price products.

  2. 02

    Phase 2 — Stability and scalability

    Within the current sprint: decouple the shared platform layer from brand-specific payment logic, consolidate the duplicated loyalty stack and patch the live injection vulnerability, fix memory leaks and enforce dynamic image delivery.

  3. 03

    Phase 3 — Governance and growth

    Over a 1–2 month horizon: CI/CD security gates and linting standards, PII-logging refactor across all integrations, brand identity build-out and WCAG AA remediation.

06 / System Architecture

Architecture revealed as a system story.

Scroll through the technical decisions to see how each platform layer connects to the next.

Live architecture map

Anonymized assessment model

Audit signals to remediation roadmap

Five assessment tracks are evaluated through customer, operational and business exposure before remediation is sequenced.

01 / Assessment tracks

01

Architecture

Shared platform boundaries, brand isolation and integration ownership

02

Security & privacy

Access controls, sensitive configuration and privacy-safe observability

03

Performance

Memory, responsive assets, layout stability, fonts and failed requests

04

Storefront quality

Catalogue, product discovery, cart, checkout and recovery journeys

05

Accessibility

Inclusive storefront behavior and remediation requirements

Prioritization

Business exposure

Customer impact, security, compliance, revenue exposure and operational stability determine delivery order.

CustomerSecurityComplianceRevenueOperations

03 / Remediation roadmap

01

Immediate

Business protection

Prioritize confirmed security, transaction-integrity, catalogue and primary conversion-path risks.

02

Structural

Stability & scalability

Separate shared and brand-specific behavior, consolidate duplicated integrations, and address security and performance workstreams.

03

Long-term

Governance & growth

Introduce automated quality controls, privacy-safe observability, accessibility remediation and stronger brand isolation.

32

Shared-platform cartridges reviewed

5

Assessment tracks

3

Risk-prioritized remediation phases

Public-safe audit model. Client branding, raw findings, system identifiers, security implementation details, source references and brand-specific evidence are intentionally excluded.

01

Architecture decision

Combined static code analysis with staging storefront validation and architecture mapping.

02

Architecture decision

Separated shared-platform defects from brand-specific implementation issues.

03

Architecture decision

Ranked findings by business exposure across revenue, security, compliance, customer experience, and operational stability.

04

Architecture decision

Structured remediation into immediate protection, stability and scalability, and governance and growth enablement.

07 / Engineering highlights

Where the hard problems were won

The proof points a technical buyer should inspect first.

Impact

Payment fraud risk eliminated

Credentials and payment signing keys stripped from logs, hardcoded encryption keys moved to secure preferences, all affected keys rotated — no forgeable hashes remain.

Impact

Primary conversion path restored

The product-listing add-to-cart failure — a complete conversion-path break for all users — identified and fixed for immediate revenue recovery.

Impact

Highest-ROI channel reactivated

The abandoned-cart integration was entirely absent from the active codebase; restoring it reopened one of retail's highest-return marketing channels.

Impact

Mobile speed index under 3 seconds

Against 7+ seconds at audit time — by fixing memory leaks, enforcing dynamic image delivery and eliminating an 11MB+ per-page image payload.

Impact

Systemic risk named and measured

Code duplication across brands was the platform's single largest systemic risk — a known injection vulnerability was patched in one brand yet live in another.

Impact

Compliance posture strengthened

GDPR and PCI audit surface materially reduced: PII logging refactored, stored-XSS injection surfaces closed, unauthenticated debug endpoints removed.

08 / Technology

The delivery stack

01

Salesforce Commerce Cloud

02

SFRA

03

Architecture Review

04

Security Assessment

05

Performance Audit

06

Storefront QA

07

WCAG Review

08

Remediation Planning

Confidentiality protocol

The client identity and detailed findings remain confidential. Publish only anonymized themes and the remediation methodology; never publish the raw deck, exploit details, credentials, internal source references, or brand-specific evidence.

Build with Marsos

Bring us the difficult system.We will make it buildable.

Start with a clear technical direction, an architecture that can scale, and a delivery plan your team can trust.